Comments on: Why do we multiply combinations? https://betterexplained.com/articles/why-do-we-multiply-combinations/ Math lessons that click Sat, 13 Aug 2022 16:51:10 +0000 hourly 1 By: kalid https://betterexplained.com/articles/why-do-we-multiply-combinations/#comment-345911 Fri, 27 Jul 2018 16:23:00 +0000 https://betterexplained.com/?p=10358#comment-345911 In reply to Alessan Kularatnam.

Hi, check out https://betterexplained.com/articles/easy-permutations-and-combinations/ for more. Essentially you start with 8 choices, then 7, then 6, then 5 (and so on). Hope that helps!

]]>
By: Ashwin Yadav https://betterexplained.com/articles/why-do-we-multiply-combinations/#comment-345044 Sat, 14 Jul 2018 16:21:00 +0000 https://betterexplained.com/?p=10358#comment-345044 thank u very much for such helpful discussion

]]>
By: Alessan Kularatnam https://betterexplained.com/articles/why-do-we-multiply-combinations/#comment-338050 Sun, 22 Apr 2018 11:34:00 +0000 https://betterexplained.com/?p=10358#comment-338050 Hi Kalid,
Great article and really appreciate it. Keep up the great work man! Just had one question.
You stated

“The numerator (n!) is the max volume assuming each of the n choices has its own dimension. The number of rearrangements of 8 people is 8 * 7 * 6 * 5 * 4 * 3 * 2 * 1.”

How did you get this? I tried to do the square thing with the pants and shirts but still couldn’t grasp why we just multiply the numbers (8*7*6*5…) in the statement above?

Thanks in advance

]]>
By: SundaraRaman R https://betterexplained.com/articles/why-do-we-multiply-combinations/#comment-335705 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 08:26:24 +0000 https://betterexplained.com/?p=10358#comment-335705 > Now, let’s say the medals are identical: we’re giving a tin can to 3 out of 8 people. We need to further remove dimensions, because we have 3! = 3 * 2 * 1 = 6 redundancies for each permutation in our solution space.

This part seems unclear to me. After some thought I (think I) understand how the 3x2x1 came about, but in context it’s not obvious, and does not directly follow from the explanations before it.

I think it’ll be useful to edit in a small explanation at that point in the article.

]]>