Comments on: BetterExplained Calculus Course Now Available (Public Beta) https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-beta/ Math lessons that click Fri, 01 May 2020 00:13:58 +0000 hourly 1 By: Anonymous https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-beta/#comment-379845 Wed, 22 Jan 2020 23:23:57 +0000 http://betterexplained.com/?p=3669#comment-379845 1zqjxf'”(){}:/1zqjxf;9

]]>
By: navneet https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-beta/#comment-328067 Wed, 09 Apr 2014 20:29:26 +0000 http://betterexplained.com/?p=3669#comment-328067 hi khalid….,,, i have thought of a small intuitive idea on “laplace transform” need your suggestions on it….
Laplace transform are basically used to solve differential equation. we know that derivative of e^x =e^x the same function…. so if we can express a function f(t) in terms of e^x all the D operators will vanish… and we will get a simple picture … something like watching a function wearing exponential glasses .. and how do we do that… by division…like how many 2 are there in 10 ??? =10/2=5 …. likewise how much (scaling factor) of e^xt in f(t)..??= f(t)/e^xt…. but since the function f(t) is extending in time ,so we have to integrate to get real expression of f(t) in e^xt. thus we get L{f(t)} =integration f(t)*e^-xt dt..
i also think the term “s” used to denote variable in laplace transform is misleading… it should be “sigma” (i don’t know how to write its symbol :D :D)…
my textbook uses s>o ,s<k like terms where s is complex variable…and i have learned that complex variables do not have ordering property (i.e they can't be compared by equality or inequality ) and that confused me …. i even had a argument with the teacher….
need some intuitive lessons on complex integration and analytic functions….help to rescue

]]>
By: kalid https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-beta/#comment-327613 Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:39:15 +0000 http://betterexplained.com/?p=3669#comment-327613 Hey Tim, thanks for the comment. Great point. There’s something neat that a curve holds so much information in the derivative — it’s almost like a hologram (or a cell in a body) where any tiny portion contains information about the greater whole. The equation for each derivative can be used to create the parent curve.

]]>
By: Tim McGrath https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-beta/#comment-327602 Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:21:19 +0000 http://betterexplained.com/?p=3669#comment-327602 K–

In learning the Maclaurin series, I was struck by how the description of a whole curve–or at least the seeds of that description–could be contained in something as nebulous as the nth derivative. It reminded me of fractal geometry, where the concept of self-similarity can be found on every scale, from the smallest to the largest.

]]>