Comments on: Quick Insight: Easier Arithmetic With Calculus https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-arithmetic/ Math lessons that click Wed, 06 Feb 2019 20:37:58 +0000 hourly 1 By: JOSHUA MORGAN https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-arithmetic/#comment-333563 Mon, 05 Sep 2016 19:26:27 +0000 https://betterexplained.com/?p=6304#comment-333563 I lost you at “From here, we can take the integral:” I don’t know what an integral is…

]]>
By: kalid https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-arithmetic/#comment-333355 Wed, 10 Aug 2016 03:09:45 +0000 https://betterexplained.com/?p=6304#comment-333355 In reply to i♥️computers.

Yes, Calculus (integrals, derivatives) was intended for “smooth” functions (lines, curves, etc.). There is a version called Discrete Calculus which can deal with jagged staircase patterns that we find in counting. The confusion between the two (“why doesn’t Calculus work perfectly with regular arithmetic?”) was something I had to resolve. Hoping to write more on this.

]]>
By: i♥️computers https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-arithmetic/#comment-333343 Mon, 08 Aug 2016 19:36:09 +0000 https://betterexplained.com/?p=6304#comment-333343 It looks like the integral cuts through the jaggedness, but the summation operation “fits” the discrete function better. To me, this means I have yet to figure out a standard way to convert a summation notation into a formula notation in the same way an integral notation is transformed.

]]>
By: al johnson https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-arithmetic/#comment-333331 Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:44:20 +0000 https://betterexplained.com/?p=6304#comment-333331 how to compute risks

]]>